Writing
Thoughts on art, culture, perception and life
There are so many unanswered questions, and I have found for myself that these questions are essential. With my writing, I want to give them the space to grow.
I want to mention that the thoughts here are my very own synthesis of thoughts from various sources and perspectives to questions that many might see as already resolved. For me, it is only when I can express these concepts in my own words that I have truly learned something about myself.
The first and most important question is: "What are you searching for?" The answer defines my identity — not as an artist, creative professional, or whatever term I decide to use in a certain context, but as a person. In my writing, I want to make my search public and share what I found important to learn, aiming to find possible answers not only for myself. By making it public, I hope that even without the final answer at hand, I can contribute to the search of others as well.
_ 26.08.2026
What is Abstraction?
An approach based on the cultural heritage of patterns that connect the mind, nature and technology.
Across all cultures and throughout history, humans have used patterns and abstraction to express basic principles and higher-order principles, rather than isolated symbolic observations. Patterns are far more than simple decoration. From the geometric arabesques of Islamic architecture to the intricate kente cloths of Ghana and the minimalist structures of the Bauhaus, pattern has served as a universal visual language to show the structure of the world. In early cultures, repetitive motifs often symbolised the cyclical nature of life and the cosmos; in modern art, abstract painting was used to reveal invisible harmonies, exemplified by Piet Mondrian’s “Boogie Woogie” series. Wassily Kandinsky described abstraction as a spiritual necessity.
Today, in a postmodern society, patterns and abstraction have become highly relevant in art and science to explain the interconnectedness of human senses, rhythms of nature, and technological systems.
This is especially illustrated with the advent of computer-generated art, which has transformed how artists create and engage with patterns. Using algorithms and computational systems, artists can explore complexity, repetition, and variation at scales and precision that are impossible by hand. Early pioneers such as John Whitney experimented with mechanical and digital systems to generate dynamic, rhythmic visual patterns for film. Peter Halley maps the architecture of urban networks, information flows, and technological systems in his neon-colored grids of "cells" and “conduits.” In parallel, European artists like Frieder Nake and Georg Nees developed algorithmic drawings using early computers, translating mathematical rules into visual compositions.
The intellectual basis for these new artistic approaches can be traced to Stephen Wolfram’s concept of the Ruliad — a vast network of all possible computational rules — which suggests that the entire universe can be understood as an emergent pattern of relationships. At its core, Wolfram’s work demonstrates that even very simple rules, when applied iteratively, can produce highly complex, often unpredictable behaviour. This principle is most famously illustrated in his study of cellular automata, simple grids of cells that evolve over time according to defined rules. Despite their simplicity, these systems generate structures that resemble natural patterns, from the branching of trees to the growth of crystals, revealing how complexity can arise from basic computational principles.
The Fibonacci sequence is the earliest and most commonly known example. It reveals universal mathematical relations that exist in organic forms like shells and flowers. It is complemented by Benoît Mandelbrot’s fractals, exposing the recursive geometries that define both natural and computational systems. Throughout history, this interplay between order and chaos has mirrored the fundamental structures found in nature and technology. Visual art has long reflected these observations, as vividly illustrated in patterns and graphics throughout human history. The style of these patterns may vary; however, the principle remains the same.
_ 03.09.2026
Chromophobia — About Colour and the Fear of It
Why does black feel serious? Why does white feel sophisticated? And why does colour so easily become loud, childish, cheap or unserious?
Our preference for black, white and grey might seem like a matter of taste. But perhaps it is something deeper: a cultural inheritance. A set of associations that has been passed down for centuries and has shaped the way we perceive colour before we even make a conscious decision about it.
The art historian and writer David Batchelor gave this phenomenon a name: In his book Chromophobia, he describes a persistent Western tendency to distrust colour — to associate it with the superficial, the emotional, the ornamental, the irrational or the foreign. Against this, colourless spaces and objects often appear controlled, intellectual and serious. This fear of colour is not necessarily a fear in the literal sense. It is more subtle. It is the feeling that colour needs to be handled carefully. That it can be too much. That it can make something less sophisticated. And perhaps this is why we so often choose black when things get serious.
The myth of white antiquity
One of the most powerful examples can be found in the way we imagine the ancient world. We have inherited the image of Ancient Greece and Rome as a world of pristine white marble: white temples, white bodies, white sculptures. The image has become almost synonymous with classical beauty itself — rational, timeless, ordered and pure. But the ancient world was not white. Greek and Roman sculptures were often painted in vivid colours. Traces of pigments have survived on many sculptures, revealing a visual culture very different from the monochromatic image we have inherited. The exhibition series GODS IN COLOR makes this discrepancy particularly visible, reconstructing the polychromy of ancient sculpture and confronting us with how radically our perception of antiquity has been shaped by its later interpretation. The so-called myth of white antiquity was reinforced during the Renaissance, when classical art was rediscovered and elevated as an ideal. Its whiteness became part of a larger cultural idea of rationality, order and restraint. In other words, we did not simply lose the colours of antiquity. We turned their absence into an aesthetic ideal.
Falling into colour
This association between colour and the irrational can also be found in one of the most familiar stories in popular culture. The Wizard of Oz may be one of the most popular stories teaching children that falling into colour is also a fall from grace: Dorothy is swept from her ordinary black-and-white world into the colourful dreamland of Oz.
The transition is visually spectacular, but it also carries a deeper cultural message. The black-and-white world represents the ordinary and familiar. Colour marks the departure from it — into fantasy, emotion and a reality that is less stable. Falling into colour becomes a fall from reality: a seductive descent into dreamland, where we loosen our grip on the rational. Colour is not simply decoration. It can represent a loss of control.
The black crowd
Perhaps nowhere is this cultural hierarchy more visible today than in the art world. Walk through a contemporary art fair or exhibition opening and you will often encounter an almost uniform visual language: black clothing, muted colours, minimalist interiors, white walls and restrained typography.
Of course, this is partly fashion and partly coincidence. But the persistence of black as the colour of intellectual and cultural authority is difficult to ignore. Black has accumulated centuries of meaning. It has been associated with the Church, the Court, power, discipline and status. Later, the black suit became a symbol of modern male authority and seriousness. Black communicates distance. Knowledge. Control. Sophistication. It does not ask to be noticed. It suggests that the person wearing it already knows.
Colour, by comparison, can appear more exposed. It announces a decision. It reveals preference. It can be playful, emotional, expressive or excessive. And this may be one reason why colour can feel less authoritative: it makes us take a position.
Better safe than sorry
There is another reason why colour can feel risky — particularly in commercial and global contexts.
Colour carries meaning, but meaning is highly influenced by cultural upbringing. A colour that communicates celebration in one culture can communicate mourning in another. In many East Asian cultures, for example, white is traditionally associated with mourning, while red can represent luck and prosperity. In many Western contexts, white is associated with weddings and purity, while red can suggest danger, passion or warning. The colour itself has not changed. The interpretation has. For a globalised brand, this creates a particular problem. Choosing a strong colour means choosing a meaning — and that meaning may not travel with the product. Black, on the other hand, often feels like the safer choice. It can be formal, neutral and sophisticated without demanding a very specific cultural interpretation. Better safe than sorry. Perhaps this is one of the hidden advantages of neutrality: it reduces the possibility of being misunderstood.
The comfort of neutrality
None of this means that black is inherently more elegant than colour, or that colour is somehow less sophisticated. It means that we have been taught to read them differently. We inherit visual codes long before we become conscious of them. We learn that black belongs to seriousness, white to purity, grey to neutrality — while colour belongs to childhood, celebration, emotion and excess. Even the first visual tools we give children reinforce this distinction. Colour belongs to play. Buntstifte, drawings, bright surfaces and experimentation. Seriousness arrives later, often dressed in black, white and grey. Perhaps this is why our relationship with colour is so complicated. Colour is seductive because it is expressive. But precisely because it is expressive, it is also risky. It carries history, symbolism and cultural baggage. It asks us to decide what something should mean. Black asks less of us. It can disappear into the background while still communicating status. It can appear timeless because its cultural meaning has already been established for us. Maybe, then, our preference for black is not simply a preference for elegance.
Maybe it is a preference for certainty. Because colour demands a position. And taking a position is always more dangerous than staying neutral.
